Dispute & Disagreement
When parties can't agree on value or viability

We provide independent operational and market analysis that both sides can reference — with full transparency on our methodology, so the conclusion is something both parties can stand on.

Lender vs. Borrower
Asset assessment in troubled situations

When a workout requires clarity on what the asset is actually worth — and what it would cost to fix — we deliver the honest read, grounded in operating reality rather than either side's position.

Multi-Party Transactions
Brands, investors, and operators at the same table

We help complex deals move forward by providing a shared, expert frame of reference no single party could credibly provide on their own.

Independence isn't a tagline — it's a structure.

A few principles guide every third-party or mediation-style engagement.

No Mandate to Sell
We don't represent a brokerage, lender, or brand. Our conclusions aren't shaped by a transaction we need to close.
Transparent Methodology
Every assessment shows its work — assumptions, comp sets, and data sources are disclosed so all parties can evaluate the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Operator-Grounded
Our read comes from having run the operational side of hotel deals, not just modeled them — which is what makes the opinion credible to both finance and operations people.
Scoped Engagement
We agree on scope, access, and deliverable format upfront — with both parties, where applicable — so the process itself isn't a point of contention.

Need an unconflicted read on a situation?

No proposals, no pitches. A direct conversation about the deal, the dispute, or the question — and whether we're the right fit to help.

Start a Conversation